Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque Meters, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla M, Velez Garcia-Nieto Good, Isla-Tejera B
3 months) between your history browse day therefore the full guide big date. Using this information, guides must look into asking for article authors regarding SRs so you can up-date their literary works look until the greet of SRs. SR profiles might also want to determine the full time slowdown within history research time of studies so as that the data try up-to-day to possess active systematic decision-and then make.
References
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz Grams: Systematic recommendations within the health care a practical book. For the. Cambridge: Cambridge School Push,; 2001: step one on the internet financial support (148 p.).
Chalmers We. Part 24: having fun with medical evaluations and you can reports out-of ongoing trials having medical and ethical demo structure, keeping track of, and revealing. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Medical feedback in the medical care : meta-research in framework. second ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj-new jersey, Jones DR. Research synthesis due to the fact key to so much more defined and you will efficient research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:31.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Is actually logical recommendations upwards-to-big date during the time of book? Syst Rev. 2013;2:thirty six.
Palese An excellent, Coletti S, Dante A good. Book abilities among the higher impression basis medical guides last year: a retrospective analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi M, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Majority of logical critiques wrote inside the large-perception periodicals did not sign in the brand new protocols: good meta-epidemiological studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;sixty.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen Yards, Elo S, Kyngas H. The methodological top-notch systematic studies published during the highest-impression medical publications: a glance at brand new books. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Exercises systems inside research depending behavior: review regarding reusable discovering objects (RLOs) to own understanding meta-research. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Cock sucking, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR is actually a reliable and you will legitimate dimensions equipment to evaluate brand new methodological top-notch scientific feedback. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Meters, Vallve Odena M, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic Good, Jeric Meters, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak Meters, Poklepovic Pericic T, et al. Methodological and you may revealing top-notch scientific feedback blogged in the higher positions publications in neuro-scientific aches. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The grade of logical reviews at your fingertips functions: a diagnosis having fun with AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Va, Sharif MO. An enthusiastic AMSTAR testing of your own methodological top-notch medical feedback regarding dental healthcare treatments authored on the diary out of used dental technology (JAOS). J Appl Dental Sci. 2011;19(5):4407.
Health-related recommendations and you can meta-analyses on psoriasis: role away from funding sources, conflict interesting and you will bibliometric indicator because predictors regarding methodological quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):163344.
Brandt JS, Downing Air-conditioning, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Violation classics from inside the obstetrics and gynecology: the new 100 most frequently quoted record articles over the last fifty decades. Was J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e1eight.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di Meters, Tam WW, Tang J. Shipping and epidemiological attributes away from penned individual diligent study meta-analyses. PLoS One to. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Approval regarding PRISMA declaration and quality of logical feedback and you will meta-analyses wrote for the breastfeeding publications: a combination-sectional studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Bj, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers Yards, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Outside validation of a dimension tool to evaluate scientific product reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One. 2007;2(12):e1350 Dating profiloverskrifter for menn.
دیدگاهتان را بنویسید